independent government header image

Building Control Independent Panel: Government response to report

Wed, 08/12/2026 - 11:56

The Building Control Independent Panel was established in March 2025 to consider recommendations made in the Grenfell Tower Inquiry final report. This asked for an independent panel to be set up to consider whether to remove commercial interest from building control and move to a national authority model.  

 

The report was submitted to the government in March 2026. The government has considered the Panel’s findings, principles and recommendations, and is publishing this initial response alongside the report.

The government response, published on May 20th, set out its initial position on the Panel’s principles for reform and commits to undertaking further analysis of the recommendations. Where required, this will include consulting on the most effective and proportionate way forward.

The document also outlines action the government is already taking which aligns with the Panel’s principles, including steps to support workforce capacity, improve funding sustainability, strengthen data and digital capability, increase process clarity, and embed reform within the wider programme of building safety and regulatory change.

Published 20 May 2026

The response says:

The government is grateful for the care, expertise and insight that the Chair and Panel members have brought to this review. Government also recognises the commitment and professionalism of Registered Building Inspectors (RBIs) whose work plays a vital role in upholding building safety standards, often in challenging circumstances.

background dark blue

Building Control Independent Panel

The government agrees with the Panel’s assessment of the current system for building control, where:

bc text and image
  • there are skilled and committed professionals who are prevented from doing their jobs as effectively as they should because of how the system currently operates and whose concerns have not always been heard.
  • there are longstanding structural challenges, including conflicts of interest, fragmentation, uneven expectations, capacity pressures, and inconsistent approaches to inspection, enforcement and data.
  • significant reform has already been delivered across the wider building safety system since 2017. This includes establishing building control as a regulated profession; creating and operating the Building Safety Regulator as regulator of both the profession and Higher Risk Buildings; and progressing the transition towards a Single Construction Regulator. These reforms have shown real world progress, and any further change must build on this.
  • building control is not being supported by an effective wider building safety system. Building control cannot and should not compensate for weaknesses elsewhere, and wider reform is required to ensure each part of the system fulfils its role effectively in delivering safe buildings and supporting growth.
  • there are skilled and committed professionals who are prevented from doing their jobs as effectively as they should because of how the system currently operates and whose concerns have not always been heard.
  • there are longstanding structural challenges, including conflicts of interest, fragmentation, uneven expectations, capacity pressures, and inconsistent approaches to inspection, enforcement and data.
  • significant reform has already been delivered across the wider building safety system since 2017. This includes establishing building control as a regulated profession; creating and operating the Building Safety Regulator as regulator of both the profession and Higher Risk Buildings; and progressing the transition towards a Single Construction Regulator. These reforms have shown real world progress, and any further change must build on this.
  • building control is not being supported by an effective wider building safety system. Building control cannot and should not compensate for weaknesses elsewhere, and wider reform is required to ensure each part of the system fulfils its role effectively in delivering safe buildings and supporting growth.

The building control profession is a vitally important workforce which is highly valued by government as the enablers of nationally important drive to provide safe, good quality new housing and other buildings. 

Our priority is to enable RBIs to operate as confident, independent regulators who are part of a system which provides proportionate oversight, clear processes and sufficient capacity. Future reform must be carefully phased and sequenced in partnership with the sector. This is critical to avoid disruption to existing arrangements, while preserving and growing capacity. We must ensure a resilient and stable system for the long term that delivers a strong, local regulatory service that protects the public and delivers high-quality buildings.

background dark blue

Key principles and recommendations

The Panel identifies 5 principles to guide reform, which the government accepts as the foundation for strengthening the building control system:

  1. Independence in the public interest: regulatory decisions must be insulated from commercial incentives, whether building control is delivered in the public or private sector.
  2. Consistency by design: similar work should receive similar oversight and enforcement wherever it occurs and whoever undertakes it.
  3. Capability at scale: the model must sustain specialist competence, effective supervision and provide robust career pathways.
  4. Transparency and data: a strong digital backbone, underpinned by clear data standards, interoperability and visible accountability.
  5. Efficiency and resilience: fewer, stronger statutory bodies that can plan, prioritise and intervene early.
bc image 2
  1. Independence in the public interest: regulatory decisions must be insulated from commercial incentives, whether building control is delivered in the public or private sector.
  2. Consistency by design: similar work should receive similar oversight and enforcement wherever it occurs and whoever undertakes it.
  3. Capability at scale: the model must sustain specialist competence, effective supervision and provide robust career pathways.
  4. Transparency and data: a strong digital backbone, underpinned by clear data standards, interoperability and visible accountability.
  5. Efficiency and resilience: fewer, stronger statutory bodies that can plan, prioritise and intervene early.

The Panel also sets out a series of recommendations to strengthen the current system and more fundamental recommendations for longer‑term reform.

The government commits to undertaking further analysis of these recommendations and, where required, consulting on the most effective and proportionate way forward. The remainder of this response therefore sets out the government’s initial approach, ahead of fuller proposals and detailed implementation options.

Initial approach:

We are already taking, and will continue to take, a coherent set of actions that align with the Panel’s principles for reform, including:

We recognise the workforce pressures identified by the Panel and consistently raised by the sector. That is why we have invested £55m over the next three years to build capacity and enable more skilled RBIs.

Current charging arrangements create challenges for local authorities’ ability to invest in their teams. Following consultation, we intend to introduce revised charging regulations to enable full cost recovery across a wider range of building control activities and functions.

Approaches to building control data capture are inconsistent and inefficient, with heavy reliance on paper, limiting transparency and effective oversight. We will shortly publish a Digital Building Control Roadmap, which will set out how we will work with the sector to improve efficiency, consistency, transparency and data sharing.

The BSR has launched a review of Conditions of Authorisation for these Self‑Certification Schemes, and the Government will further review the operation of Self-Certification Schemes to identify potential improvements.

MHCLG and the Building Safety Regulator continue to strengthen regulatory processes, guidance and oversight. Work is also progressing to establish the future Single Construction Regulator (SCR), which will take on the responsibilities of the BSR through a carefully phased transition, alongside other existing and new functions.

The government will invest £5 million of the announced £55 million workforce funding in a small number of pathfinder areas experiencing high housing growth, which have limited building control capacity. They will test new collaborative delivery models that support professional skills and career progression and deliver responsive local services with the resource to meet demand. Further details will be confirmed later this year, and findings will help inform future policy development and organisational design.

We look forward to working in partnership with the building control sector, the regulator and industry, as we take our next steps considering the Panel’s recommendations. It is time for government and the sector to look forward together to a safer future for all of our buildings using the invaluable work of Dame Judith Hackitt and the wider Panel as the compass to guide that work.

The panel members are:

  • Dame Judith Hackitt (Chair): Renowned engineer who led the landmark Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety following the Grenfell tragedy.
  • Elaine Bailey: Senior executive with extensive operational leadership experience across the construction, housing, and justice sectors.
  • Ken Rivers: Prominent chartered engineer and process safety specialist with deep expertise in managing high-hazard industrial environments.
  • Rt Hon Nick Raynsford: Former UK Minister for Housing and Planning, widely recognized for his long-standing policy contributions to construction safety.
  • Dr David Snowball: Former Director of Regulation and field operations head at the Health and Safety Executive (HSE).

Want to learn more?

Discover our latest News & Media

Filter by :
Tags
Period
Event Type
Free